Re: Hypocrisy of brawl
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:11 am
But but but Rose - Brett was only defending his poor brother!
Welcome to the unofficial Melbourne Storm discussion forum
https://stormfans.club/
Isn't there a panel of multiple people that can be used for the judiciary panel. Given that Manly are involved, I would think they'll try to avoid using the ex manly players.Diehard_Storm wrote:I actually think you'll find that Adam Blair is in the most trouble.storming wrote:glen stewart is in the most trouble! he doesnt get charged and a chance to plea, he just goes straight to tribunal and must be looking at 6+ weeks easily
He has also been referred to the judiciary (meaning the panel believe a grade 5 was insufficient) on top of his grade 2 striking charge.
The only hope Adam has, is that Bellew can successfully argue he was defending himself after first being struck by Glenn Stewart and that this was successful provocation.
Again - with two out of the three judiciary member ex-manly players, we need to have faith that they will put their team allegiances to one side in hearing both cases.
They can't be serious. Of course he had a choice - he should have kept walking.Earlier yesterday, the Herald spoke to Stewart's lawyer, Christopher Branson, SC, who made it clear he believed there was good reason to contest the charge that could end Stewart's season if he is found guilty. It can't be denied that Stewart threw punches, but the argument will be he had no choice.
How many ways can you spell TOOLWoody wrote:Manly really seem to have no shame in all of this. They want to stuff around the hearing tonight so they sack their representative, Stewart comes out and says he`s the victim, and this guy sounds really contrite too
smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/best-day-of-my-life-nrl-brawler-20110831-1jlfx.html