Finals Week 1
King has been referred straight to the judiciary if you can believe that sh*t... Once again, the slanted view of commentators leading the NRL around by the nose.
Tui got a Grade 2 Dangerous Contact charge. Will miss 1-2 weeks.
https://www.nrl.com/news/2020/09/27/sto ... gons-loss/
Tui got a Grade 2 Dangerous Contact charge. Will miss 1-2 weeks.
https://www.nrl.com/news/2020/09/27/sto ... gons-loss/
Junior Paulo received a grade 1 dangerous contact charge. If he pled guilty he was free to play but would have 75 carry over points. Paulo played the week after so he pled guilty.
-
- Tropical Cyclone
- Posts: 2350
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:49 am
- Location: Under the Black Dot
Incidents are only referred to the judiciary if the MRC feels that no charge adequately caters for the seriousness of the incident. That is what is complete bullsh*t.
The Tui one should have been there definitely.
The Tui one should have been there definitely.
-
- Thunderstorm
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 1:02 pm
Incidents are only referred to the judiciary if the MRC feels that no charge adequately caters for the seriousness of the incident.
It also means that this is a media spin against Storm and the way we tackle, which happens every year. It also means he will not play again this year.
It also means that this is a media spin against Storm and the way we tackle, which happens every year. It also means he will not play again this year.
-
- Thunderstorm
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 1:02 pm
And of course Ryan Matterson only got a minor charge and is free to play against us.
If a player was never going to be in consideration for selection anyway does the charge have any relevance? ie, is it a moot point, was he a chance over the next three / four weeks (games)?glennb wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:58 pm Incidents are only referred to the judiciary if the MRC feels that no charge adequately caters for the seriousness of the incident.
It also means that this is a media spin against Storm and the way we tackle, which happens every year. It also means he will not play again this year.
It does impact our depth if we have any injuries or suspensions over the next month.Bullucked wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2020 10:05 pmIf a player was never going to be in consideration for selection anyway does the charge have any relevance? ie, is it a moot point, was he a chance over the next three / four weeks (games)?glennb wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:58 pm Incidents are only referred to the judiciary if the MRC feels that no charge adequately caters for the seriousness of the incident.
It also means that this is a media spin against Storm and the way we tackle, which happens every year. It also means he will not play again this year.