R24 Sun - Melbourne v Canberra @ AAMI
Welch on the radio said Grant hadn't trained all week, rested as per the "high performance" peoples instructions, only being at the captains run. Welch also said Garlick is a bigger body to help take on the up front size of the Raiders packPapenhuyzen23 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 1:11 pm Garlick starting for Grant which I can only assume is a tactical switch to keep Harry a bit fresh, Katoa also in for Eisenhuth.
From the world of FB, but I did hear this myself too
-
- Tropical Cyclone
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:49 am
- Location: Under the Black Dot
-
- Thunderstorm
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 1:02 pm
I was wondering the same thing. Hopefully it just reflected that they wanted to give Tepai and Bronson bigger minutes.
I hope Will Warbrick is ok for next week. Craig said Paps unlikely next week , so we need Will to wing and Reimis to centre .
-
- Squall
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:27 pm
Excellent performance after a slightly shaky first 10.
I was sceptical about not starting with NAS but it worked great as we held the Raiders in check.
We really need our middles to work as when we attack up the gut we look far better than going lateral.
Great performances across the team. Hughes inclusion was huge and Grant was massive off the bench…
I was sceptical about not starting with NAS but it worked great as we held the Raiders in check.
We really need our middles to work as when we attack up the gut we look far better than going lateral.
Great performances across the team. Hughes inclusion was huge and Grant was massive off the bench…
-
- Squall
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2023 1:02 pm
Is the Garlick start and Harry on the bench going to be a regular thing like the Smith / Grant sitiuation from last year or will it be a one off?
I'm personally OK with them using that tactic again with Harry. Easy to forget that this is his first year with us basically as the sole number 9. Not everyone is going be Cameron Smith and play every minute of every game plus SoO and internationals for 15 years.
Eh, Harry was an 80 minute hooker last season too. Not really sure I'm a fan of the tactic itself but managing his minutes is totally fine as he has played a lot of footy the last few months.
I think there is probably more upside in taking him off before and after halftime for 10-15 minutes. He gets a bit too helter skelter when he's fatigued so freshening him up for the later stages of games might benefit him and the team. That would actually give a real role to Garlick or Wishart as well.
I think there is probably more upside in taking him off before and after halftime for 10-15 minutes. He gets a bit too helter skelter when he's fatigued so freshening him up for the later stages of games might benefit him and the team. That would actually give a real role to Garlick or Wishart as well.
-
- Hail Storm
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 8:08 am
Bellamy mentioned in the presser that they used the garlick/grant combo as a way to negate Canberra's tactic of putting a lot of traffic through grant early to get his tackle count up and tire him out.
Seems to have worked well, and I dare say it gets used a time or during the rest of this year's campaign. Certainly seemed that Penrith middles did a good job of targeting Harry and reducing his effectiveness. He made 13 more tackles than Mitch Kenny..
Seems to have worked well, and I dare say it gets used a time or during the rest of this year's campaign. Certainly seemed that Penrith middles did a good job of targeting Harry and reducing his effectiveness. He made 13 more tackles than Mitch Kenny..
Brandon played plenty of hooker taking plenty of time off him last year, was my point.blazza18 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 14, 2023 10:00 am Eh, Harry was an 80 minute hooker last season too. Not really sure I'm a fan of the tactic itself but managing his minutes is totally fine as he has played a lot of footy the last few months.
I think there is probably more upside in taking him off before and after halftime for 10-15 minutes. He gets a bit too helter skelter when he's fatigued so freshening him up for the later stages of games might benefit him and the team. That would actually give a real role to Garlick or Wishart as well.
Yep, this is what I am thinking too. Looking at his stats (didn't see the game) he made plenty of runs but only made 6-7metres per run, so not really where he'd want to be just yet.
-
- Hail Storm
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:50 pm
I only watched the highlights of the Falcons, but the positive for me was that whilst he wasn’t the one scoring or making the big runs - he was always there as a support player ready for the pass.