StormFans.club

bourbon_rat wrote: since you're for bites  Why did you leave off that wonderful,purpose built stadium at Wembley
Let's not let a piddling thing like distance stand in the way of a good troll thread

If Wembley had a team in the NRL, sure .  .  .?

I don't see why the GF shouldn't be in Melbourne when the Storm get into the GF . . . It's our home city . . .  so we should put the NRL final here. You seriously are lacking a brain.  What about the other team?  Do they come from Melbourne? The NRL Grand Final is Telstra Stadium.  Booked, paid for...

How many reasons do you want me to list as to why it should not or will not be played in melbourne. I personally would love it to be down here but we are only looking at the small picture these below are just some reasons why it will not. The games biggest market (by far) is sydney and by moving it...

yeah but it's not the NRL's home, if we get into the top 4 the Storm get a home final.  Goal how would you feel if the AFL grand final was played elsewhere?  The only major NRL games that get played down here are a Tri-Nations test and a State Of Origin, there's no guarentee that the Storm(guys jus...

Maybe you should check your facts goat - the stadium was committed with or without Victory.  The only difference was the capacity from 27500 to 31 or 33k.  It is soccer people like yourself that make people want to see soccer go back to what it was pre world cup - and like it or not, the sport is f...

lotti wrote: Goat answer me this, why did you join this forum, was it just to annoy us or was there another reason?

I'm a Storm member/supporter, so it seemed a logical step.

lotti wrote: no we're not we're just anti-trolls which you just happen to be one.

I haven't said anything derogatory about anyone,  explain how I'm a troll?

So you're anti-Storm then

lol, this coming from the person that barracks for every single NRL team.  Are you a fan of all the AFL teams as well or do you have a special one? I was being sarcastic . . . (obvious to some) . . . because people here barrack for more than one NRL team and that is just incomprehensible to me . . .

lotti wrote: no there wouldn't be one but then the Victory didn't have to hold out as long as they did.

Victory will do what is right for Victory . . . they just signed apparently.

Dragging up a thread from last year..... lThey sent out a membership package to my home address. I rang them and said "I'm not renewing my membership because I'm moving to Central Queensland". I explained that I hadn't lost interest or passion for the Storm, I just couldn't get to games. ...

Why are you all anti-victory?

That site's a great footy tipping aid

The head of Victory was on SEN earlier today and while he said they we're still negotiating with the government, the impression he gave was that they were leaning toward the TD deal as it was pretty much too good to pass up. Personally i don't want them at the new stadium and hope they take the Dom...

I don't think an actual Storm supporter would argue.  If you're one of those people who supports two teams or more then just spare me already.  You don't barrack for the Storm.  You barrack for league expansion.