Search found 307 matches
- Sun May 12, 2024 2:01 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 10 vs Sharks
- Replies: 103
- Views: 1616
Re: Round 10 vs Sharks
You would think the sin bin is punishment enough
- Sat May 11, 2024 9:26 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 10 vs Sharks
- Replies: 103
- Views: 1616
Re: Round 10 vs Sharks
That shit was just filthy
- Sat May 11, 2024 8:44 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 10 vs Sharks
- Replies: 103
- Views: 1616
Re: Round 10 vs Sharks
Respect to Anderson as well - been really solid
- Sat May 11, 2024 8:34 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 10 vs Sharks
- Replies: 103
- Views: 1616
Re: Round 10 vs Sharks
Both Sharks try’s had a lot of help from the ref.
They have had little attack otherwise.
How exciting is Sua though, albeit has looked a little lost in attack.
They have had little attack otherwise.
How exciting is Sua though, albeit has looked a little lost in attack.
- Fri May 10, 2024 4:11 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Official thread and signing news
- Replies: 4649
- Views: 1260104
Re: Official thread and signing news
Shows he has a lot of faith in this team still.
- Sun May 05, 2024 11:31 am
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Official thread and signing news
- Replies: 4649
- Views: 1260104
Re: Official thread and signing news
You have to wonder - with all the complexities of the salary cap and the fact TPJ would have been on big money at the dogs if he stayed - how would we even be allowed to sign him? The argument would be he would have been on X and the Storm don’t have that so therefore even if he is prepared to accep...
- Sat May 04, 2024 5:36 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 9 vs Gold Coast Titans
- Replies: 105
- Views: 2352
Re: Round 9 vs Gold Coast Titans
Tell me he didn’t stand on the line with that 40/20
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 11:09 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Official thread and signing news
- Replies: 4649
- Views: 1260104
Re: Official thread and signing news
If Jahrome really did want to leave, I would leak that we were looking to sign him to a new extension.
That way when we ask for Tino as compensation, it’s all fair!
That way when we ask for Tino as compensation, it’s all fair!
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:29 am
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 7 vs Sydney Roosters
- Replies: 105
- Views: 10066
Re: Round 7 vs Sydney Roosters
Unless a player has an absolute blinder, I’m never a fan of a player on the losing side getting the most votes.
Radley was good - but hardly a blinder.
Radley was good - but hardly a blinder.
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 11:04 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 7 vs Sydney Roosters
- Replies: 105
- Views: 10066
Re: Round 7 vs Sydney Roosters
Paps only went 5-6m a run tonight. Such a key component for us with and without the ball but we’ve gotta figure out a way for him to do more with less and get him some open space. He’s simply not a threat on kick returns atm and the dummy half runs for 2m don’t really do anything. We just struggle ...
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:47 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 7 vs Sydney Roosters
- Replies: 105
- Views: 10066
Re: Round 7 vs Sydney Roosters
Wowee clearly the memo this week at the refs powwow meeting was watch the third man at the legs.
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 8:15 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 7 vs Sydney Roosters
- Replies: 105
- Views: 10066
Re: Round 7 vs Sydney Roosters
Would have thought some offside Roosters on that kick. JWH especially
- Sun Apr 14, 2024 11:16 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Official thread and signing news
- Replies: 4649
- Views: 1260104
Re: Official thread and signing news
Paps stands out to me on that list.
Be interesting what that future holds.
Be interesting what that future holds.
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:31 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 6 vs Bulldogs
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7611
Re: Round 6 vs Bulldogs
Can Warbrick pull his head in
- Mon Apr 08, 2024 9:43 pm
- Forum: Melbourne Storm
- Topic: Round 5 vs Broncos
- Replies: 133
- Views: 8835
Re: Round 5 vs Broncos
Doesn’t do any favours to the NRLs case when the highlighted passages clearly says the referee will call surrender in that case.