StormFans.club

tugga wrote:For *lima lima lima duck*'s sake, play Billy at five eighth and leave Munster at full back. Please.

This is a likely option, unless Scott moves to 5/8 and Munster to Centre? Billy is basically a second 5/8 in any case, defensively his shoulder issues though could be a worry.

bula wrote:I have a feeling we'll sign Marshall to a one year deal as been reported. Could work well if they think our five eight prospects are a year away.

Please no.

I found the Sharks fans to be pretty awesome ot be honest. I'll admit the 2012 GF scarred me for life. The Dogs fans were putrid so I went along yesterday not know what to expect. I only heard one bad comment and it wasn't even that bad. Everyone I spoke to was gracious in victory and even before t...

After watching the AFL Grannie, I have to say I am concerned about the officials and the fairytale story that is Cronulla.......we could be up against it.

The player formerly known as Cooper Cronk needs a spell. Any half decent side knows how easy we are to shut down close to the line. Has Bellamy ever heard about running angles? Smith took some very ordinary options tonight which stymied the attack as well, we have some kind of unbreakable bond with ...

I think Bellamy is about done, the Australian coaching job awaits. We need a fresh voice at the top. 1 try in 3 halves of football with enough ball to win 4 games. Every side knows our style better than we do. I can't see a win next week, but with the Dragons/Panther/Tigers amongst the next four we ...

We need new ideas, regardless of who is in the team, we have no creativity at all.

We should now focus on developing things for next year, a bit like when we played for no points....develop players and a bit of flair.

We are officially pathetic in attack, this is the worst Storm performance since I can remember, we are not even playing against a top side, this is a middle of the road Bulldogs outfit. What does that make us?

Its time.

We are so pedestrian in attack, Bellamy needs to evolve to a game plan that involves more than a couple of dummy runners and pass out the back.

Don't blame the refs when you leak 32 points FFS. That was embarrassing tonight. We would not have leaked 32 points if it wasn't for the refs though, so I don't understand the comment. The refs didn't let in 32 points. No, but you can argue they let in 6 when you consider Waddell was never square :?

Tonight has conclusively proved the NRL is corrupt and is sitting next to WWE for realism.

blazza18 wrote:Don't blame the refs when you leak 32 points FFS. That was embarrassing tonight.

We would not have leaked 32 points if it wasn't for the refs though, so I don't understand the comment.

Inglis#3 wrote:Was Waddell square? It didn't look like it..

Waddell would have been penalised if that play was 50 meters up the field, definitely not square...however you don't get stripped one on one like that ever...the cheer leading from the commentary box meant there was no objective look at that.