Cronk, Inglis, Smith, Slater - which one can we afford to lose?
-
billythekidslater
- Squall
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:05 pm
It's becoming increasingly obvious that one of the big four will need to go in order to free up our Salary Cap.
So which one of Cronk, Inglis, Smith or Slater do you think will have the least impact if he is lost to another club/code?
I would say Smith or Cronk because on their day Inglis or Slater can win a game on their own as they have shown in Prelim/Grand Finals. They have the brilliance which a team needs.
Which one would you chose to go?
So which one of Cronk, Inglis, Smith or Slater do you think will have the least impact if he is lost to another club/code?
I would say Smith or Cronk because on their day Inglis or Slater can win a game on their own as they have shown in Prelim/Grand Finals. They have the brilliance which a team needs.
Which one would you chose to go?
-
Super Cronk
- Site Manager
- Posts: 9191
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 10:15 am
- Location: NSW
Inglis.
Much easier to fill the centre postion then it is for halfback and hooker. Slater is also an amazing player. In an ideal world ild keep em all...
Much easier to fill the centre postion then it is for halfback and hooker. Slater is also an amazing player. In an ideal world ild keep em all...
[img]http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/7238/stormef5.gif[/img]
[b]PROUD MELBOURNE STORM SUPPORTER[/b]
[b]PROUD MELBOURNE STORM SUPPORTER[/b]
Inglis. As much as I hate to say it.
Smith is the leader and widely regarded as the best hooker in the game.
Slater is one of the few players actually recognised by non-league fans.
Cronk is a leader too. Good looking guy and very marketable.
GI is great and I love hoim to bits, but I would choose the other three ahead of him, as horrible as that sounds.
Smith is the leader and widely regarded as the best hooker in the game.
Slater is one of the few players actually recognised by non-league fans.
Cronk is a leader too. Good looking guy and very marketable.
GI is great and I love hoim to bits, but I would choose the other three ahead of him, as horrible as that sounds.
2012 premiers. Legit.
tugga wrote: Inglis. As much as I hate to say it.
Smith is the leader and widely regarded as the best hooker in the game.
Slater is one of the few players actually recognised by non-league fans.
Cronk is a leader too. Good looking guy and very marketable.
GI is great and I love hoim to bits, but I would choose the other three ahead of him, as horrible as that sounds.
inglis would go nice at manly cover fullback wing centre & 5/8 plus he adds another dimension in attck he can kick also lol .. just on the quiet if i was you mate it would be cronk or slater .. atleast cam goes for the whole 80 minutes & cleans the ruck for yous plus whos going to teach the new & young guys how to grapple tackle & all the other techniques he knows lol.. sorry had to throw that in
Coops seemd to be travelling pretty well int eh last 10 minutes on Monday?jjai wrote:tugga wrote: Inglis. As much as I hate to say it.
Smith is the leader and widely regarded as the best hooker in the game.
Slater is one of the few players actually recognised by non-league fans.
Cronk is a leader too. Good looking guy and very marketable.
GI is great and I love hoim to bits, but I would choose the other three ahead of him, as horrible as that sounds.
inglis would go nice at manly cover fullback wing centre & 5/8 plus he adds another dimension in attck he can kick also lol .. just on the quiet if i was you mate it would be cronk or slater .. atleast cam goes for the whole 80 minutes & cleans the ruck for yous plus whos going to teach the new & young guys how to grapple tackle & all the other techniques he knows lol.. sorry had to throw that in
2012 premiers. Legit.
-
Insomniac
- Tropical Cyclone
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 4:43 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
- Contact:
@ jjai: How about you find your own talent and develop your own players instead of trying to buy your premierships? It'd be interesting to see the Manly books over the years... I'm sure there's been no dodgy dealings done with that Delmege guy... 
-
Michael :P
- Tropical Cyclone
- Posts: 3090
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:34 am
Slater, becuase we have a class replacement in Widdop.
Speak for yourself, I don't want any of them.jjai wrote:tugga wrote: Inglis. As much as I hate to say it.
Smith is the leader and widely regarded as the best hooker in the game.
Slater is one of the few players actually recognised by non-league fans.
Cronk is a leader too. Good looking guy and very marketable.
GI is great and I love hoim to bits, but I would choose the other three ahead of him, as horrible as that sounds.
inglis would go nice at manly cover fullback wing centre & 5/8 plus he adds another dimension in attck he can kick also lol .. just on the quiet if i was you mate it would be cronk or slater .. atleast cam goes for the whole 80 minutes & cleans the ruck for yous plus whos going to teach the new & young guys how to grapple tackle & all the other techniques he knows lol.. sorry had to throw that in
aww mate they would have nailed us years ago if that was the case remember every 1 hates us & we dont care.. if we were rorting they would have glady nailed us before you mate.. think about it .. its been said about us for years so dnt you think schubert would have nailed us by now .. or could it be because schubert played for us ..lol..Insomniac wrote: @ jjai: How about you find your own talent and develop your own players instead of trying to buy your premierships? It'd be interesting to see the Manly books over the years... I'm sure there's been no dodgy dealings done with that Delmege guy...
-
Insomniac
- Tropical Cyclone
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 4:43 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
- Contact:
jjai wrote:aww mate they would have nailed us years ago if that was the case remember every 1 hates us & we dont care.. if we were rorting they would have glady nailed us before you mate.. think about it .. its been said about us for years so dnt you think schubert would have nailed us by now .. or could it be because schubert played for us ..lol..Insomniac wrote: @ jjai: How about you find your own talent and develop your own players instead of trying to buy your premierships? It'd be interesting to see the Manly books over the years... I'm sure there's been no dodgy dealings done with that Delmege guy...
Quite possible... more likely that you guys are simply better at cheating... 
lmao.....Insomniac wrote:jjai wrote:aww mate they would have nailed us years ago if that was the case remember every 1 hates us & we dont care.. if we were rorting they would have glady nailed us before you mate.. think about it .. its been said about us for years so dnt you think schubert would have nailed us by now .. or could it be because schubert played for us ..lol..Insomniac wrote: @ jjai: How about you find your own talent and develop your own players instead of trying to buy your premierships? It'd be interesting to see the Manly books over the years... I'm sure there's been no dodgy dealings done with that Delmege guy...