Sandor Earl linked to Storm
Surely we wouldn't, what about the no d*&^heads policy?
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-pre ... 59b97f9b5a
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-pre ... 59b97f9b5a
If he is cheap and willing to buy in to our way of doing things not problem not the first come back kid we have had and if steps out of line gone. But I do think he has done the time for the crime and having watch the interviews he seemed to wear his mistakes and not blame anyone if I remember correctly.
I would be happy to have him, he has a lot to prove and is an unknown at this point. We've taken bigger chances in the past.
However, I do think it would be a waste. We do have the depth in outside backs.
However, I do think it would be a waste. We do have the depth in outside backs.
- Danger D
- Thunderstorm
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 12:08 pm
- Location: Living next door to Alice
Agreed. I don't think we need him and I don't really recall him lighting the world on fire when he was previously in the NRL, but like nacho says he has something to prove and if that makes him hungry to work hard and apply himself then he might be an asset.bushman wrote:If he is cheap and willing to buy in to our way of doing things not problem not the first come back kid we have had and if steps out of line gone. But I do think he has done the time for the crime and having watch the interviews he seemed to wear his mistakes and not blame anyone if I remember correctly.
His twitter quote suggests that despite his past indiscretions he may pass the no DH policy.
"It will be a privilege to be apart of any NRL club and it's an honor to be mentioned in the same breath as a club like the Storm."