Round 18 - Sea Eagles vs Storm
- Danger D
- Thunderstorm
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 12:08 pm
- Location: Living next door to Alice
I don't think that team listing means anything until we see what happens with origin and how players back up. I'm assuming Billy will have a big one and at his age I'd be inclined to rest him rather than get him to back up for the weekend. That would probably mean Hughes to FB and then wither Jacks or Croft to HB.
- steaming stormer
- Tropical Cyclone
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 5:34 pm
- Location: Altona Meadows
Very hard to fault the team named... will obviously see how everyone pulls up from tomorrow night
-
- Thunderstorm
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 1:02 pm
That is a great worry. Jesse back early is excellent , but Dale is now 6 weeks or so into a 4 week injury layoff.Mattpoet wrote:Still no Finucane
Probably because we could be without up to four of our first choice backs?NevilleB wrote:Why is Young still being named. Go away already
Bill, Chambers (not my first choice), Fox and Eddie.
We must all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately
- steaming stormer
- Tropical Cyclone
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 5:34 pm
- Location: Altona Meadows
With Munster hurting his finger (haven't heard if broken or not??), you surely don't back him up.
Jacks to 6? Or Croft to 7 allowing Hughes to take over the running 5/8 role?
Jacks to 6? Or Croft to 7 allowing Hughes to take over the running 5/8 role?